This post may contain affiliate links which we may earn a small percentage of purchases at no extra cost to you.
Grubhub cuts fees on $50 plus orders as delivery apps battle for users, while Waymo’s autonomous costs challenge Uber and Lyft economics.
The food delivery and ride-hailing landscape is shifting again, this time with aggressive consumer discounts on one side and sobering cost realities on the other. Two recent stories highlight the tension shaping the gig economy in early 2026, Grubhub eliminating fees on larger orders to compete more directly with DoorDash, and new reporting suggesting autonomous driving may still cost more than paying a human driver for Uber or Lyft.
Stop guessing and start tracking. Use our Driver Earnings Calculator to quickly estimate your daily delivery income. Built for real drivers who want real numbers.
Taken together, these developments showcase a core issue facing delivery platforms: price sensitivity among customers and the unresolved economics of automation.
Grubhub removes fees on $50 plus orders
Grubhub has announced it will cut all delivery fees on orders over $50, a move clearly aimed at competing more aggressively with DoorDash. According to reporting from The Tech Buzz, the fee removal applies to delivery, service, and small order fees, effectively simplifying the checkout experience for higher value orders.
This strategy reflects an ongoing battle for consumer loyalty. Delivery customers have become increasingly sensitive to fees, often abandoning carts once service and delivery charges stack up at checkout. By eliminating those line items for larger orders, Grubhub is betting that customers will decrease hesitation to place orders.
For restaurants, the implications are mixed. Higher order totals can mean better margins per transaction, but only if the platform absorbs the cost without increasing commissions on the back end. For drivers, fee changes rarely translate directly into higher pay. Instead, platforms often adjust incentives, promotions, or algorithmic dispatch to balance the books.
From a driver perspective, these pricing wars rarely offer stability. Promotions can temporarily increase order volume, but they can also lead to tighter margins for platforms, which historically results in pressure on driver pay structures or incentive programs later on.
Waymo automation costs exceed human drivers
Waymo, the autonomous vehicle unit backed by Alphabet, has long been framed as a future solution to labor costs in ride-hailing. However, a recent New York Post report paints a more complicated picture.
According to the article, operating a Waymo autonomous vehicle can currently cost more than paying a human driver working for Uber or Lyft.
These costs include vehicle hardware, sensors, ongoing software development, remote monitoring, maintenance, and regulatory compliance. While automation promises long term savings by removing driver wages from the equation, the upfront and ongoing expenses remain significant.
This challenges a common assumption in the gig economy, that human drivers are merely a temporary cost to be eliminated. In practice, human drivers remain the most flexible and cost efficient solution in many markets, particularly during peak demand or in complex urban environments.
For delivery drivers and ride-hail drivers alike, this is important to recognize. Despite years of headlines predicting rapid automation, human labor continues to underpin the system. Autonomous fleets may supplement specific routes or regions, but they are far from universally cheaper or scalable at this stage.
What this means for drivers
For drivers, these two stories reflect a familiar pattern. Platforms compete aggressively for customers through discounts and promotions, while continuing to experiment with automation behind the scenes. The result is a constant state of flux for gig workers.
On the delivery side, fee removal can lead to short term increases in order volume. Drivers may see more offers, especially for larger orders, but this does not guarantee better pay per mile or per hour. In some cases, platforms offset promotions by reducing base pay or tightening acceptance algorithms.
On the ride-hailing side, automation headlines often create anxiety among drivers about job security. However, reports like this one suggest that human drivers remain economically competitive. In many cities, paying a driver is still cheaper than deploying and maintaining a fully autonomous vehicle.
This does not mean automation will disappear. Instead, it is likely to coexist with human drivers for years, filling niche roles rather than replacing the workforce outright.
The bigger picture for the gig economy
Both stories point to a broader truth about the gig economy, margins are thin, and no single solution has solved the fundamental cost problem. Consumers want fast, cheap delivery. Platforms want growth and profitability. Drivers want fair, predictable pay. Balancing all three remains elusive.
Grubhub’s fee elimination is a reminder that customer acquisition still depends heavily on pricing psychology. Waymo’s cost challenges show that technology alone is not a silver bullet. For now, the system continues to rely on human labor, subsidized promotions, and ongoing experimentation.
As these dynamics evolve, drivers who stay informed are better positioned to adapt. Understanding why promotions appear and disappear, and why automation headlines do not always translate into immediate change, helps drivers make smarter decisions about when and where to work.
Celebrity marketing and the George Clooney “eat the fees” Super Bowl ad
In a striking move that combines marketing muscle with platform strategy, George Clooney starred in Grubhub’s first-ever Super Bowl commercial where the central message was simple: “Grubhub will eat the fees.” In the ad, Clooney dramatically interrupts a dinner party to announce that Grubhub will waive delivery and service fees on orders over $50, a benefit the company says it will institute indefinitely.
The choice of a high-profile celebrity in such a premiere advertising spot isn’t accidental. Super Bowl ads are among the most expensive brand placements in the world, and having a recognizable face like Clooney’s deliver the headline is intended to cut through the noise and shift public perception. By pairing the “eat the fees” tagline with the gravitas of a Hollywood star, Grubhub aims to reframe a pricing change as a cultural moment rather than just another promotional offer.
Looking ahead
Expect more pricing experiments from delivery platforms as competition intensifies. Fee caps, subscription perks, and targeted discounts are likely to continue. At the same time, autonomous vehicle projects will keep advancing, but at a pace slower and more expensive than early predictions suggested.
For now, human drivers remain central to both food delivery and ride-hailing. The economics still favor flexibility over full automation, and platforms know it.
With over 10 years working experience in the delivery app industry, we try to deliver the hottest resources for deliver driver apps, customer perks, and insights to the best delivery experience. We do use AI to assist in our posts, and we personally curate the topics that interest you most!